A state exists, in the end, for the preservation of the lives of its people. There is no more demonstrable proof that European countries have become anti-states, destined to be destroyed, that this revulsive article. It echoes what I wrote a few days ago at WorldNetDaily.
A state which not only actively kills its people, but pushes the ones whom it regards as economically inconvenient to die, has become the worst supplanting of itself. Marketing murder, acting out murder, pushing the defenseless and the weak off the cliff, this is abject wickedness in high places. It is the powerful cynically manipulating the distressed for the gain only of the finances for the ruling class.
If any Swiss citizen asked me whether or not it was justifable and right for the Swiss to take up arms against the Swiss state, to overthrow it, I would have to answer that it was. Because here we have the utterly healthy wife of an ill man being pushed into suicide because of her vulnerable condition of emotion . To do nothing is to allow the decent, vulnerable, innocent, adult human being to be murdered. Far better that the indecent, the invulnerable, the guilty person, who is antagonizing the impoverished and defensesless, be the one to suffer loss of position, loss of job, institution, and yes even loss of life. To use your government position of power and authority to murder the helpless vulnerable is the ultimate delegitimization of any official post.
And the fault for any such hypothetical insurrection, and deaths which might result in any such rebellion against the Swiss state, would fall entirely on the present Swiss regime. Because, that regime has already committed to murder the innocent. I repeat: it is a matter of institutional law and practice that the Swiss intend to murder the innocent. As such, if a legitimate armed power rises up, determined to protect the lives of the innocent and destroy the guilty, by supplanting the Swiss government, the only trade which has been made is that it is the guilty who perish and the innocent who are now saved. If the Swiss regime rescinded its institutional committment and action of murder, no grounds for legitimacy in taking up of arms would exist because the preservation of life might still remain as a possibility. As it is, Switzerland has precluded life being preserved. The only choice a Swiss insurrectionist has today is, “Is it the guilty, or the innocent, who’s life should be threatened?”
Again, think about this. Doing nothing means the innocent die. Attacking the Swiss state means a chance that the innocent are protected and the guilty are punished. The cynical justification, the only justification, Switzerland offers is that killing healthy grandmama saves money.
Swiss zealots should act. This is outrage. But it is worse: methodical, malevolent, calculant, cynical, marching, organizedm, automated outrage. This Nazi evil will push and push and push until the elites have wiped out everyone they do not like - your loved ones. They will kill them in the clinics, then expand the clinics. They will kill those who come willingly, later go and get those who don’t. They are pushing for universal, worldwide, death-care in order to do this on the grand scale. And they are softening you up, one at a time, raising the temperature of the water slowly, so you keep swimming around in it.
It is far more moral, then, that the innocent are protected and the guilty face the muzzle of a gun, telling them, “No.”
I challenge the Swiss people to rise up, and form movements to overthrow this evil regime that is doing this to your vulnerable people. Yes, you heard me. Take up arms and threaten the Swiss state with force, demanding the lives of the innocent be protected. Overthrow the regime and take control away from people who want to push distraught grandmothers off the cliff.
Remember, they are not going to stop with a few healthy grandmothers.
Are the actions of the Swiss today not the perfect opposite of egalatarianism? One elite class uses psychological inducement, advertising, pressure, coercion, to kill a vulnerable-innocent class of inarguably sentient adults, for money?
I will also point out that if the Swiss do not rise up and overthrow this evil regime, there will be absolutely no defense of Switzerland against the radical Islamists. I do not favor the cause of the Isalmist you understand. But I am pointing out the obvious. A state must retain and jealously gaurd its legitimacy, especially to repel foreign enemies and usurpers. Switzerland seems to think that its legitimacy is invulnerable, that nothing the state ever does could lead to its own destruction. But this certainly has. When a state waves pom-poms for the killing of distraught old ladies, when it launches propaganda to make the suicide of the little people “cheery”, it has become an evil caricature of itself and must, absolutely, fall. And fail it shall.
The only open question lies with the Swiss: is your future a saved, moral Switzerland, or is your future the Taliban? Will you do the moral thing, or will some contemptuous foreigner come in and do it for you?
Choose.
Act.
And a word to the United States – note well the marriage between the cynical excess of the ruling class, and the opening of the doors to terrorism.
If the ruling class delegitimizes the state by murdering the innocent, terrorism’s advance has made its foothold. If America wants to remain any kind of free, she must purpose anew that, “All men are Created equal.”
