AndrewLongman.com

Christian Conservative Existential Commentary

Archive for July, 2009

We Need Car Reform Now

Sunday, July 26th, 2009

The price of cars is too high.  So, I would like to propose car reform.

We need the government to offer a car plan.  Since they own GM and Chrysler, this should be no problem.  But if you look at the price of cars, and what it is expected to do over the next few years, it’s not going to be enough that GM and Chrysler offer government car plans.  No, “more” “needs to be done”. Indeed, because we need cars, and everyone has a right to one, this justifies and empowers government intervention.

So, I propose we set up a government car price board which would have the power to set prices on cars.  Industry could petition the car board for permission to set prices at a certain level, and they would have to state their reasons.  But then the car-care board would set the final prices.

Utopia would result where there would be a chicken in every pot, and a government car in every government produced garage.

Of course, there are a few nattering details yet to be worked out.

For example, the care-care board would want to set prices lower than the car companies.  And they would have the power to set prices lower than profitability for the car companies.  That would be perfectly ok.

See, when the car companies were forced to produced cars at a loss, we would simply threaten the car-care providers with prison sentences unless they produced cars.  Due to their social obligation, they would only want to produce more and more cars, better and better cars.  It would be hard to restrain all the utopia we’d unleash.  When car companies lost money on every car, workers alone would get paid.  Only employees would get a check – greedy owners who do nothing all day would get nothing.  The employees would be assured of their check because it would come straight from the government!

As profitability soared, we could cut prices again.  In fact, we could just continue to force the manufacturers to charge less and less so that car prices were low.  And since quality and price were assured, along with profitability which would naturally follow, we would not have to imprison too many workers.

In achieving universal car coverage, one car at least for every American, so that Americans could have their right to a car fulfilled, some car providers would go out of business because they would not provide sufficiently to the state.  In that case, their competitors would be rewarded with larger car provider contracts.  Private car providers could peacefully coexist with the public car providers until, of course, failure to observe a selfless profit structure drove those private car providers out of business.

But the real cost savings in producing new government cars will come when we realize that old cars must be destroyed.  The government car reconciliation commission will be sent out to impound old and worn out cars, in order to destroy them.  People from whom these cars are seized will only be too willing to give up their old and capitalist car, so as to drive a new and achievement-oriented government car.  As the old cars are pushed into the crusher, they will no longer be a burden to our society and new efficient cars can take their place.  Even cars one and two years old should be destroyed so that every car on the road is at its peak of efficiency, and new car production will remain sky high!

Sometimes when I talk this way, I get so giddy, and the crowds around me chant stupid slogans.  They fill themselves with the happiness that I have as well, that the utopia is here, it is just around the corner.

Hey wait!  Why not do the same thing for health care!?

Palin Hatred Explained, vol. II

Saturday, July 25th, 2009

She’s just like most of us,explained Brenda Davis, a Palin fan from Wasilla wearing a “Go Sarah!” shirt. “Mom, Christian, conservative, Republican, family lady.

When Maureen Dowd and Froma Harrop turn inside out with poseur rage over the very…existence…of Sarah Palin, the vast right wing conspiracy, otherwise known as Kansas and Alaska, see a simple sneer.

See, if you are Mowd or Frop, you think that you are it and that the rest of the world thinks exactly as you do.   You think the sun rises and sets on liberal newspapers. You think that everything you think is gauche is actually gauche, because you think it in New York or its surrogates.  You think that if you hate it, then everyone else will too, or should too, or soon will, since coven told you so.

But what Mowd and Frop fail to grasp is that all the following things have infinitely more grasp on the psyche of all us out here in fly-over-country than they do:

Mom, Christian, conservative, Republican, family lady.”

Mowd and Frop essentially hate place those concepts as high, first-principle, duty, self-sacrifice-worthy concepts.  They especially hate placing those first-principles in the lofty human category of “normal”.  They regard those principles as quaint, throw-back, anachronistic, neanderthal, unenlightened, and doomed to fade away with time.  They are so convinced of those positions, they don’t even think about them.  They just take them for granted.

But like Brenda Davis explains, family-values is who Sarah Palin is.   And the word for Mowd and Frop that I have is: that is who America is.  That is who we, the grand, huge, sweeping, We, are.  Hundreds of millions of us.

Now of course, there are some who wouldn’t include the word Republican.  I would simply observe that “Mom, Christian, conservative, family lady” people don’t worry too much if you accidentally call them a Republican when they aren’t.  But again, Mowd-Frop thinks that if you include “Republican” in the list, you suddenly pare that group down to fourteen people, because that is the entire Republican population of New York City. They also think that the group defined by “Mom, Christian, conservative, family lady” is connected to fully 8% of the population, and all those are Hispanic.  That is how you think when you think that New York City is the only real and active portion of America.

But what I want to request of Dowd and Harrop is that they continue their frantic, desperate, all-out assault on Sarah Palin.  Because, when they do this, Brenda Davis, and an entire country full of “Mom, Christian, conservative, family ladies”, out there see more and more clearly how anti-Mom, anti-Christian, anti-conservative, anti-family, the superior sneering set from New York really are.  Whenever the NYT people attack Sarah Palin, they open another one thousand Mom-Christian-conservative-family-ladies eyes to how evil the evangelical-secularists are.  See, Mom-Christian-conservative-family-ladies are nice people.  They have a very hard time believing that people who run the major newspapers in our country hate them.  They have to be convinced.  So, you know, rock on, Maureen.

So, with every reinforcing attack, the legions of Brenda Davis (go Brenda) do see more and more obviously that Mowdfrop not only intends evil, but is so possessed of ad hominem attack, so driven by personal animus, that all veneer of even ideological discussion falls away.  When you assault a mother for bearing a Downs baby, that is way beyond just the definition of personal.

When you say your pregnant teen daughter is “looking stupid” when she had to make a TV appearance because Mom got nominated, that’s evil.  You don’t attack Mom’s babies just because you don’t like Mom’s politics.

When Maureen accuses Palin of country music queen meltdown, and Harrop openly calls Bristol’s looks “stupid”,  you know they aren’t trying to defend liberalism with logic.  They just hate the Brenda Davis creed and everything she stands for.  You can feel it.  It doesn’t matter if Sarah sometimes has a bad hair day and says something garbled.  Brenda Davis does that sometimes too, and Brenda Davis expects some reasonable treatment.  When the wolves bark and pounce on Sarah, Brenda just feels the love.

So hate on Dowd, hate on Harrop. The more you expose your utter sneering contempt for the people of this country who catch the fish, fight the wars, and grow the cotton, the more we know who you are, and the more votes you lose.  Whenever you have a pang of Palin hatred, don’t wait to control your tongue.  Run to the keyboard so that the whole world can hear, so that me and Brenda Davis can behold the bubbling cauldron.  And if steam shoots out your ears, get a video camera and put it on youtube.

And Sarah?  You perform a great national service when you give staff members of the New York times vapor lock.   Keep on truckin’ for Jesus. My advice is to hit the Pro-Life speaking circuit, and do your best to support the Personhood movement.  Maureen Dowd will have seizures in the street if you do that.

[For each new revelation in how and why Sarah Palin is hated, you may watch this space for exposition, nuance, and subtle filigree]

The Doctor Will Kill You Now

Friday, July 24th, 2009


Posted: July 23, 2009
1:00 am Eastern

By Andrew Longman
© 2009 

I have commented before that the purpose of socialized medicine is not health care, but rather government-run death care. The choker bill presently being rammed down America’s throat in the Congress is no exception. In light of the recent history where hospitals have forcibly dehydrated people to death, everyone should pay attention to their gag reflex.

On page 430 of the 2009 Death Care Act we find:

(B) The level of treatment …may range from an   …read more at WorldNetDaily.com

Sellout “Christians” praise witchcraft

Saturday, July 18th, 2009

Focus on the Family and Christianity Today are sell outs.  That’s not news. Dobson abandoned his pledge to never endorse a pro-abortion judge supporting candidate for public office, ages ago.  But people need to be reminded that Focus on the Family and Christianity Today are secular-liberal publications, not Christian ones.  Here’s the reminder:

Unable to resist being “cool” they find they simply must find something nice to say about Harry Potter.

Let me offer a conservative Christian opinion of Harry Potter, since formerly conservative organizations have become liberalized in their desire to be “cool” and to be “relevant”, i.e. to have (more…)

© 2009 AndrewLongman.com. All Rights Reserved.

Apples of Gold - Affordable Fine Gold Jewelry